Considering the series' tradition of returning antagonist(Popovich,Edward Page,Everrette Saunders)I think this would be a very good choice for MC6(If its coming anytime soon)
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All131 posts
- General13 posts
- General Discussion32 posts
- Modern Combat Versus4 posts
- Modern Combat 5: Blackout50 posts
- Modern Combat 4: Zero Hour29 posts
- Modern Combat 3: Fallen Nation1 post
- Modern Combat 2: Black Pegasus1 post
- Modern Combat: Sandstorm1 post
Sort by
Card Layout
General Discussion
Just Updated
Wikians talk very less in this wikia.You guys and girls not a robot right?Dont be a robot lol.
Hey I am new to this wikia,but I know how wikia works.Wikias are a type of social networks too.Why not stopping just editing pages robotically and starting communicating with each other? Its a lot of fun,I know.
Participate in an official Gameloft survey about the future of Modern Combat here: http://www.gameloft.com/minisites/mcv-survey-16/
I feel like Gameloft doesn't listen enough to the real fans, and keeps counting on the little kids putting 20 bucks into their shitty game to buy the next overpowered soldier classes. Your opinion counts (I hope... - I don't work at Gameloft).
Well, I thought about getting MC4 or MC3 because I quit MC5 because of the multiplayer gameplay. But since Modern Combat Versus is teased, I wanted to know if MC4 or MC3's multiplayer is still up to date. I even saw Sandstorm on Gameloft's App Store Page (iPad only), but I don't know if the game & multiplayer still works.
I made some nominations, so you can vote for which game should win which competition. Closes end 2016. Any questions can be asked below.
- CLOSED -> User blog:Ysbert/Contest Results
Categories
Best Storyline |
Best Multiplayer Gameplay |
Best Graphics |
Best Game Design |
I have unearthed a page of information that should prove helpful for Modern Combat 2 multiplayer pages. I am posting it here so that others can access it if needed. Link
Hi
may i place OBB player that contains sounds of weapons on any weapons pages? it would be great to let other peoples know how the weapons sound like without having to play the game.
Upon the release of MC5, we changed the colour of the wiki. Now I would like to change the wiki colour to green again. The main reason is because I simply liked the green over the orange, but since the infoboxes will get a colour per game, it would be a little weird if MC5 is the same theme as the whole wiki.
Green would be the colour of character infoboxes, location infoboxes, and other wiki templates, for example. The infoboxes for MC5 subjects will, of course, stay orange.
Once these changes are definitive, I will also change the colours of navboxes (by CSS instead of the current navbox style template). I will take care of the wordmark as well.
Progress
Infoboxes | done |
Bug with wide images in infobox lines | done |
Navboxes | done |
Tabs | done |
Wordmark | done |
Favicon | need ideas |
I know these will never be added in to the game, but whatever.
My Ideas
Modern Combat 3
Weapons:
Dragon A2
Based on: P90
Damage: 30-25
Range: 100m
Rate of fire: 690 RPM
Capacity: 50
Starting Ammo: 50/300
Deathbourne 8
Based on: Colt M1911
Damage: 70
Range: 39m
Rate of fire: 60 RPM
Capacity: 9
Starting Ammo: 9/90
Modern Combat 4
Slayer M2
Based on: HK 93
Damage: 35-20
Range: 195m
Rate of fire: 575 RPM
Capacity: 30
Starting Ammo: 30/240
Reaper C5
Based on: Desert Eagle
Damage: 85-40
Range: 104m
Rate of fire: 60 RPM
Capacity: 8
Starting ammo: 8/160
Add your ideas below. No spam. Off topic comments will be deleted.
This thread is to discuss whether or not to remove the ability for users to leave comments on articles. Please leave reactions with {{vote|+}}
or {{vote|-}}
General
My idea is to make some new parameters. game
for all infoboxes, and weaponclass
for weapon infoboxes.
Automatic categories
With both variables filled, pages can categorise automatically.
{{Infobox/weapon | game = mc3 | weaponclass = Assault rifle }}
could easily put the article in the MC3 assault rifles and the MC3 weapons categories.
But the best of all is that the category names can be changed with one simple edit to the infobox, since they will be changed on all pages the infobox appears on. I, personally, would change Category:Modern Combat 3: Fallen Nation Assault Rifles into MC3 assault rifles, but we can discuss that at any time.
We can colour the infoboxes and navboxes per game. This would create some difference between the articles. After all, they are about complete games. Users will immediately see about what game the article is.
On some articles like those about characters, we can just use the wiki theme colour for the infoboxes.
Style
I'm planning and testing to make all infoboxes and navboxes completely CSS-based. Right now, they use wikitext for styling. CSS could decrease pageload durations and makes the color idea easier. This should make no visible change.
Let me know!
Please, also if you are not an admin, comment with your opinion! (Please use{{Vote|+}}
or {{Vote|-}}
)You can post images of your personal customised HUD here. I'll start with mine:
I learned this setup from a YouTube video, and it creates a totally different play style. In the FIRST match I played with these, I got 8-4, with even two hip-fire kills. (The second match resulted in 1 kill and 9 deaths, so I changed it back.)
A disadvantage is that you can't walk while shooting, but in addition, switching to ADS and firing at the same time becomes possible. This is fine with SMGs, I got a kill before I knew that I hit someone.
But do not try to quickscope with it. You can try, but you won't get a kill.
This setup creates a tactical way of playing, with aiming down the sight at every corner. I recommend to try it, just to notice that a game can be played in many ways.
Does anyone actually use the "Random page per category" feature on the main page of this wiki? It seems like a waste of space, especially considering a lot of the time when you click on a category it brings you to an unfinished page. Are there any reasons as to why it's there?
I'm not looking for power or bossy position, but how do I become an admin? Can you list the requirements if there are any? I want to help the community improve
Wow, I was browsing on Community Central and then I found this: the LALALOOPSY wiki.
Just... ...
Speechless.
I don't know a lot about the wiki policies. But I know it's about using common sense, be nice, don't be offensive, etc.
But it seems to me that sometimes admins are using their authority to eliminate people who go against their own feelings, regardless of policies and justice.
Extract from Roman Laws: "Justice is the constant and perpetual wish to render everyone his due." That's right, everyone should have the right to speak and discuss their reasons. After discussion with the guilty user, then admins should consider ban and the period. That is how law works.
What do you guys think?
Should we use the new VisualEditor by default for editing? According to me, the new editor is more clear and it provides the option to undo/redo. Wikia guaranteed me that it also causes less dirty diffs.
You can see the VisualEditor by clicking 'VisualEditor' in the drop-down menu of the Edit button on the top of every page. If it's not there, simply click Edit.
This choice has nothing to do with the source editor, only between the standard editor of new users on this wiki.
And of cource the Source mode will ALWAYS be available as it's needed for MediaWiki to create pages.
How the editing modes look
- Source editor - Called "Source" in the tabs on the top-right of the edit screen.
- Only the code of the page.
- Rich Text Editor (Classic editor) Called "Visual" in the tabs on the top-right of the edit screen.
- A new page is loaded. Templates and magic words are shown as green puzzle pieces.
- VisualEditor - Completely other way of editing, no direct link to other editing modes.
- A new screen pop-ups, all parts of the article have the same appearance as in the normal view.